Yamin & Grant has achieved successful results for its clients in a variety of contexts, including formal settlement negotiations, arbitration, mediation and trial. The firm will often counsel clients that the best results can be achieved outside a courtroom, where clients can retain a measure of control over a negotiated result. Reasonable negotiated outcomes are only possible, however, because clients can trust the firm’s lawyers to take cases to trial, when a fair outcome cannot be achieved otherwise. The results we can share here demonstrate successes the firm has achieved for its clients, as well as the types of matters the firm’s clients have trusted it to handle.

• Independent Accountant Arbitration Award  (October 27, 2000)

• Connecticut Concrete Construction, Inc. v. ARC IceSports Danbury, Inc. et al.  (February 8, 2001)

• City of Danbury et al. v. ARC IceSports Danbury, Inc. et al. 
  (April 24, 2001)

• Wolcott Machinery & Tools Inc. et al. v Thorndike  (October 22, 2001)

• Connecticut Concrete Construction, Inc. v. ARC IceSports Danbury, Inc. et al.  (August 14, 2002)

• Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. PAC Group, LLC  (September 3, 2002)

• Mountview Plaza Associates, Inc. v. World Wide Pet Supply, Inc. 
  (May 13, 2003)

• Herman Lewis v. Bourdon Forge Company, Inc. et al.  (July 9, 2003)

• Vergopia et al v. Hometown Auto Retailers, Inc. et al.  (July 16, 2003)

• American Arbitration Association Award  (2004)

• Wolcott Machinery & Tool Inc. et al v. Thomas Thorndike, Adversary Proceeding  (June 29, 2004)

• Connecticut Law Tribune Bankruptcy Reports  (October 11, 2004)